Discussion Forums
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Browse the Community

kdb+ and q

Q+A on all things kdb+ database and the q language

2823 Posts

KX Solutions

Q+A on any KX Solutions - from Dashboards and Developer to Refinery and Surveillance

105 Posts

KX Academy

Q+A on KX Academy, training sandboxes and Capstone projects

37 Posts

Community Blogs

Introduce yourself, show and tell, or set a challenge for your fellow Community members

71 Posts

kdb Insights

Q+A on all thing kdb Insights and kdb Insights Enterprise

9 Posts

Activity in Discussion Forums

Why does @ need :: and why does . need () in amend?

https://code.kx.com/q/ref/amend/Based on the above, why does . need () to get the entire list and @ need ()?Surely this would imply:q) 1 2 3 4 5 . () /this is NOT the case1 2 3 4 5 and q) list @ :: /this is NOT the caselistHowever q)list @ enlist[::]...

amend.png amend2.png
Mannix by New Contributor III
  • 51 Views
  • 1 replies
  • 0 kudos

Why are feedhandlers not usually kdb?

We often read that feedhandlers are not kdb, and usually are either java-kdb or C++, why is this the case? why is it not ideal or possible to have a kdb feedhandler?

Mannix by New Contributor III
  • 63 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 0 kudos

Ashok Reddy on the Array Cast

In the latest episode of the Array Cast podcast we interview KX’s CEO, Ashok Reddy. On this episode we speak to Ashok about his experience in software development and the roles that KX, q and time-series computing will play in the future.

SJT by Valued Contributor
  • 327 Views
  • 2 replies
  • 3 kudos
New here?

Welcome! We want your journey here to be as great as can be, so we have put together some links to help you get quickly familiarized with the KX Community.