New Data types `sym

[analyst_tech_jo]

Hi, 

The link below does not mention details on new datatypes :

`sym is type number as 20h .. does not mean since kdb 3.0 now there can be 1 less enumeration present ?

http://code.kx.com/wiki/Reference/Datatypes

[kuentang]

Not sure what you mean. Care to elaborate?

Kim

Von: personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.com [mailto:personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag von analyst
Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015 04:29
An: personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.com
Betreff: [personal kdb+] New Data types `sym

Hi, 

The link below does not mention details on new datatypes :

`sym is type number as 20h .. does not mean since kdb 3.0 now there can be 1 less enumeration present ?

http://code.kx.com/wiki/Reference/Datatypes

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Kdb+ Personal Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to personal-kdbplus+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/personal-kdbplus.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[analyst_tech_jo]

20 - 76 were meant for enumeration. Now since 20 is for `sym, does that mean there is one less enumeration type ?

Secondly, does q assign types 20 - 76 to enumerations n round robin fashion or is there another scheme ?

[effbiae]

> 20 - 76 were meant for enumeration. Now since 20 is for `sym, does that mean there is one less enumeration type ?

a reservation has been made, and there are still the same number of seats in the restaurant.

[kuentang]

>>> a reservation has been made, and there are still the same number of seats in the restaurant.

Correct J

Kim

Von: personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.com [mailto:personal-kdbplus@googlegroups.com] Im Auftrag von Jack Andrews
Gesendet: Sonntag, 19. Juli 2015 21:02
An: Kdb+ Personal Developers
Betreff: Re: [personal kdb+] New Data types `sym

> 20 - 76 were meant for enumeration. Now since 20 is for `sym, does that mean there is one less enumeration type ?

a reservation has been made, and there are still the same number of seats in the restaurant.

On 19 July 2015 at 07:23, analyst <analyst.tech.jobs@gmail.com> wrote:

20 - 76 were meant for enumeration. Now since 20 is for `sym, does that mean there is one less enumeration type ?

Secondly, does q assign types 20 - 76 to enumerations n round robin fashion or is there another scheme ?

[analyst_tech_jo]

LOL. Thank You.