I think this example shows at least what is not documented in the Borror book. The operator changes its behavior depending on the first element of the right and left operands when they are general lists.I know that the operator is supposed to be atom...
I read page 406 in the Borror book and it would seem that there is behavior with the find (?) operator that is not addressed there: Notice the different result depending on whether the first item of the left operand is atomic or not: q)(1 2;3;3 4;4)?...
I dont get this. Is i available for every column. Could a by i select phrase and a fby in where phrase do the same thing ? Is i provided for convenience or is it a redundancy ?
Can someone just post an example of function s with datatype 100 (lambda) and 112 (dynamic queries). Also since kdb has a new data type 20 (`sym) does that mean that every other data type got shifted doen by 1 or is it eating a number from the enumer...
Doc days column type is inferred by first element inserted. twl1:([] col1: 1 2; col2: 5.1 "y") Would col2 be a general list then ?
EMEA
Tel: +44 (0)28 3025 2242
AMERICAS
Tel: +1 (212) 447 6700
APAC
Tel: +61 (0)2 9236 5700
KX. All Rights Reserved.
KX and kdb+ are registered trademarks of KX Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of FD Technologies plc.
