KX Community

Flying

I have the following code fragment: E:\test>q KDB+ 3.6 2019.04.02 Copyright (C) 1993-2019 Kx Systems w32/ 8()core 4095MB xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx NONEXPIRE Welcome to kdb+ 32bit edition For support please see http://groups.google.com/d/forum...

Flying

Hi, I had worked with kdb+ in Merrill Lynch and later Bank of America, and I'm currently working with kdb+ part-time in a small private hedge fund in China. I'm a fan of array programming. Looking forward to learning from all the cool discussions her...

Flying

I'm working on a pet project on Windows (MSVC 2019 Community) that intend to create a DLL that is to be invoked from q.exe.I found that krr/orr didn't seem to work as advertised in the documentations.Sample code:/// testdll.cpp#define KXVER 3#include...

Flying

Hi,I wonder if there is a simpler way to write a pj with uj-like semantics?The behaviour of pj is more like an lj, keys on the L.H.S. are preserved and matching values from R.H.S. are added. More often than not, though, I need a pj with the semantics...

Flying

I notice one interesting problem with the new negative -s mode since 3.1 -- query behaviour seems to differ to the point that innocent queries that run properly in positive -s mode fails in negative -s mode.The code below demonstrates it (note: the p...

Flying

Thanks for pointing this out. 2020.05.04 seems good. But I don't seem to be able to find a 32-bit q for this version. (My test environment, unfortunately, depends on a couple of 32-bit DLLs. So I had to find a 32-bit q to use.) Any luck that I can fi...

Flying

Thanks! Sure, let's catch up sometime.

Flying

Before others can understand your question, would you please specify what is considered "desired behaviour" in the first place?@see http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Flying

The evaluation of value does not see local variables in the function. Why not simply use a function for this purpose? {(0;x?" ")_ x} arg

Flying

b:(')(')[sum]

KX Community

User Statistics

User Activity

Possible memory leak with enumerated table dump?

Hi from Freddie

[C API] krr/orr doesn't report error

pj with uj-like semantics?

Curious "bug" with negative -s mode?

Re: Possible memory leak with enumerated table dump?

Re: Hi from Freddie

Re: not getting the desired behavior

Re: Value in function scope

Re: Adverb Composition: Is this a bug?