Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- KX Community
- :
- Discussion Forums
- :
- kdb+ and q
- :
- Re: How to skip a loop in kdb?

Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

How to skip a loop in kdb?

Options

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

2020.04.27 02:02 PM

`myfirstrun:raze {[x]`

L: select from ....

if count[L] <= 20

continue

end

} peach vals;

And I am trying to add an if statement in there that would skip the particular entry in `vals` if the logical condition is met.

`continue` works well in matlab, but, i am not sure of the corresponding syntax in kdb. Thank you.

4 REPLIES 4

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

2020.04.28 04:03 AM

If your intent is to continue until more than 20 records in L, then you want to keep appending records to L until your condition is met. That indicates the While iterator.

The While iterator repeatedly applies a unary function f to an initial state until some test t of the state passes. Your initial state would be (();vals) – an empty list and the values to work on. The function f will keep returning states until t applied to the latest state returns zero. Your solution is t f/(();vals) – but what are f and t?

q)L:{20>count first x} f/ (();vals)

..

f:{(x,select from... first y;1_ y)}.

You guessed peach to iterate, but a peach slave knows only what it has retrieved itself. So the simple answer is to iterate as above on a single thread, comforted by the knowledge that V4.0 primitives seek opportunities to multithread. If peach saves you a lot of time, you could process chunks of vals, with t applied after each chunk.

HTH

Stephen

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

2020.04.28 05:19 AM

`myfirstrun:raze {[x]`

L: select from ....

if[count[L] <= 20; :()]; // end early returning an empty list

// do whatever you intended to do with L

} peach vals;

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

2020.04.28 08:40 AM

If you want to exclude results that fail your test, you can get all of them and then apply the test. And peach is just fine for the iteration.

myfirstrun:raze{x where 20<count each x}{select from ... x}peach vals

Suppose, as Igor and Alvi do, that you want to abort some substantial processing on the result sets. Let us represent that as a function sp.

myfirstrun:raze{x where 20<count each x}{sp select from ... x}peach vals / choose when to apply sp!

myfirstrun:sp raze{x where 20<count each x}{select from ... x}peach vals

Perhaps it must be applied individually to the filtered results:

myfirstrun:raze sp each{x where 20<count each x}{select from ... x}peach vals

Worst case, it must be applied within your lambda. Many writers reserve the if control word for side effects, and the if[ ... ; :res] construction to returning error messages. Functional style would use Cond:

myfirstrun:raze{

L:select from ... ;

foo: ... ;

$[count[L]<=20; sp[L;foo]; ()] } peach vals

Or use the Do iterator:

myfirstrun:raze{("j"$count[L]<=20) sp/L:select from ... x}peach vals

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

2020.04.28 08:05 AM

`@[vals;i;:;] f peach vals i:where {20<count select from ...} peach vals`

vals is your list

{20<count select from ...}is your filtering function that returns a boolean

i is your list of indices that have the function applied to them

f is your function to apply

@[vals;i;:;]is a projection of the apply function, here it assigns to i (indices) that values that are to the right of the projection

Here the function f gets applied to items of vals at the indices specified in the second argument

If you don't care about peach you can encapsulate the code in the apply function:

`@[vals;where {20<count select from ...} each vals;f]`

Here the function f gets applied to items of vals at the indices specified in the second argument

Related Content

Main Office Contacts

**EMEA**

Tel: +44 (0)28 3025 2242

**AMERICAS**

Tel: +1 (212) 447 6700

**APAC**

Tel: +61 (0)2 9236 5700

Useful Information

Popular Links

Follow Us

KX. All Rights Reserved.

KX and kdb+ are registered trademarks of KX Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of FD Technologies plc.