In Jeff Borror’s classic textbook Q for Mortals you will find frequent references to moments of “Zen meditation” leading to flashes of insight into the workings of q.
My teacher Myokyo-ni liked to quote Dogen-zenji:
The Great Way is not difficult. It avoids only picking and choosing.
The Do form of the Scan iterator has a pattern I think of as ‘the Zen monks’.

— How many Zen monks does it take to change a lightbulb?
— Two. One to change it; one not to change it.
The basic pattern is to apply a function and not to apply it. Consider the trim
keyword. It must find the spaces in a string, then the continuous spaces from each end. If we had to write trim
in q it might be
q){b:x<>" ";(b?1b)_ neg[reverse[b]?1b] _ x}" Trim the spaces. "
"Trim the spaces."
We notice the repetitions:
- both
b
and reverse[b]
are searched for 1b
- two uses of the Drop operator
We want to do the search/drop thing from both ends of the string.
q){x{y _ x}/1 -1*(1 reverse\" "<>x)?'1b}" Trim the spaces. "
"Trim the spaces."
Notice the {y _ x}
reduction above. Lambda {y f x}
commutes a function f
by switching its arguments. The pattern R{y f x}/L
successively applies a list of left arguments L
to an argument R
.
Here we use 1 reverse\
to get the boolean vector and its reversal. I think of this 1 f\
pattern as the Zen monks.
Here is another use for it, in finding the shape (rows and columns) of a matrix.
q)show m:{max[count each x]$'x}string`avoids`picking`and`choosing
"avoids "
"picking "
"and "
"choosing"
q)shp:{count each 1 first\x} / shape of a matrix
q)shp m
4 8
The Zen Buddhist pension plan: “A day without work is a day without food.” Can you see any other work for the monks?